About
Foundational Principles In the Community Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Technical Excellence Alumni TIAG Membership
Careers
Why Cohen & Co Our Culture Total Rewards & Benefits Early Career Opportunities Experienced Opportunities Join Our Talent Community
Contact
Akron, OH Baltimore, MD Buffalo, NY Chicago, IL Cleveland, OH Deer Park, IL Denver, CO Detroit, MI Milwaukee, WI New York, NY Philadelphia, PA Pittsburgh, PA St. Clair Shores, MI Youngstown, OH
Client Portal
Services Industries Knowledge Center People

About Our Services

We offer tailored solutions — whether private company or owner; public or private fund, adviser or fund service provider; or Fortune 1000 enterprise. Learn how we can help you.

Find Services

Assurance Services

Employee Benefit Plan Audits Internal Controls Investment Company Audits Private Company Audits

Tax Services

Federal Tax Planning & Compliance High Net Worth & Wealth Transfer International Filings & Structuring Investment Company Tax State & Local Tax Tax Credits & Incentives Transaction Tax Planning

Advisory Services

Business Valuations Data & Insights Digital Finance Solutions IT Strategy & Implementation Litigation Support Services M&A Advisory Outsourced Accounting Solutions Transaction Services Turnaround & Restructuring

Our Industry Expertise

Our industry experience means you can find professionals who speak your language and bring earned insights to the table. Learn how we can help you.

Explore Industries

Key Industries

Digital Assets Investment Companies Manufacturing Private Companies Private Equity Real Estate & Construction Technology & Life Science
VIEW THE COMPLETE LIST

Knowledge Center

Our team wants to help your team stay up to date. Browse our thought leadership, events and news for insights and a point of view on business-critical topics.

Find Insights & Events

Insights

Browse valuable articles and publications our experts have written to help you and your organization answer key questions — and consider new ones.

Read Our Insights

Events

Join us in person and online for events that address timely topics and key business considerations.

Explore Our Events

News

Find out what is happening at Cohen & Co, from industry recognitions and growth updates, to where we are contributing to important media stories.

Read Our News
People
Foundational Principles In the Community Diversity, Equity & Inclusion Technical Excellence Alumni TIAG Membership
Why Cohen & Co Our Culture Total Rewards & Benefits Early Career Opportunities Experienced Opportunities Join Our Talent Community
Akron, OH Baltimore, MD Buffalo, NY Chicago, IL Cleveland, OH Deer Park, IL Denver, CO Detroit, MI Milwaukee, WI New York, NY Philadelphia, PA Pittsburgh, PA St. Clair Shores, MI Youngstown, OH
Client Portal
Back to Insights

Q&A: Is Tax Equalization Right for Your Mutual Fund or ETF?

by Jay Laurila, Ravi Singh

May 28, 2024 Investment Company Tax, Exchange-Traded Funds, Investment Companies , Mutual Funds

Tax equalization is one of the most tax-efficient strategies available to a regulated investment company (RIC). The strategy can reduce or even potentially eliminate a capital gain distribution requirement for your fund and your shareholders — yet not everyone uses it. 

While there are uncertainties associated with calculating tax equalization, it is a valid tax planning tool fund managers should consider as part of their overall tax strategy. Below is a Q&A to help you better understand tax equalization, and if it may be right for your fund.

1. What is Tax Equalization? 

If an entity qualifies as a RIC for tax purposes, it is allowed a deduction for dividends paid to its shareholders. The tax code says, except in the case of a personal holding company, a dividends paid deduction is allowed with respect to amounts distributed in complete or partial liquidation to the extent a portion of the distribution is out of accumulated and undistributed earnings and profits. The code further says a liquidation includes a redemption of stock, and the amount chargeable to accumulated earnings and profits upon redemption of stock is referred to as tax equalization.

2. Does the Tax Equalization Concept Relate to Shareholders Redeeming from the Fund? 

Yes. Tax equalization is a complicated concept, but we can illustrate it with a simple example. 

Let's say a shareholder purchased shares in a RIC when they were originally issued at $10 per share. Over the course of the next few months, the fund has earnings of $2 per share, which includes both net investment income and any realized gains during that period. Let’s assume that now the net asset value of the fund shares is $12 per share.

At that point, if a shareholder redeems their shares, they will receive $12 per share, which includes $10 of original paid-in capital and $2 of undistributed accumulated earnings. That $2 paid to the shareholders is considered to have been distributed out of accumulated earnings, which is then referred to as tax equalization. And the fund can then take a dividends paid deduction for those $2.

3. What is the Effect of Tax Equalization on the Redeeming Shareholder?

A redeeming shareholder’s treatment of the redemption is not impacted when the fund takes a deduction for dividends paid based on equalization calculations. Therefore, the redeeming shareholder receives the same information about the redemption proceeds on Form 1099-B. 

So, even though the shareholder has some capital gain on which they'll have to pay tax when they redeem from the fund, that fund can use a portion of the distribution as part of their dividends paid deduction and thereby reduce their distribution requirement.

4. Why Do More Funds Seem to Be Using Equalization? 

This is certainly not a new concept, and equalization has been around for decades. But the reason more funds are using it now is twofold. One, there's explosive growth in exchange-traded funds (ETFs). ETFs have always focused on tax efficiency, and tax equalization is an important tool for achieving tax efficiency. A RIC that is not an ETF (i.e. a mutual fund) may not want to make capital gain distributions, keeping them more in line with their ETF counterparts from a tax efficiency perspective.

Secondly, we are seeing equalization more because of market conditions. Volatile markets often result in some significant shareholder redemption requests. RICs may need to sell shares of securities they own at significant gains to fund redemption requests, resulting in potential capital gain distributions to remaining shareholders. Equalization allows RICs to reduce the amount of those capital gain distributions.

5. What Risks Are Involved with Tax Equalization?

There are both real and perceived risks, either of which can deter funds from using the approach. While the concept of tax equalization is established in tax law, there is some uncertainty associated with how RICs calculate the accumulated earnings and profits with respect to shares redeemed. Because of this uncertainty, along with lack of guidance from the IRS, the methodology of calculating equalization may vary from one fund complex to another. 

6. What Are the Different Ways to Calculate Tax Equalization?

Many fund complexes calculate equalization debits based on daily gross redemptions. There are some funds that perform these calculations on a weekly or even monthly basis. Others calculate using daily earnings. Since mutual funds are typically in a position to determine their actual earnings on a daily basis (because of daily net asset value calculations), prorating such earnings over the period is likely not a best practice.

Another big difference is in the area of book tax differences and how they are reflected in the calculation of accumulated earnings and profits. It is virtually impossible to generalize when all the book tax differences should be reflected in the daily calculation of earnings and profits. However, the book-tax differences, when they occur, will dictate as to when they should be included. For example, wash sales should be reflected when they actually occur. 

Another area where funds would vary in their practice is how much of a haircut they take after they calculate the available equalization amount. Some funds take a 10% haircut; some funds take as much as 20%; and there are some funds that want to maximize their equalization amount, so, they take no haircut. 

7. What Are Other Important Issues to Consider When Calculating Equalization? 

First, remember the calculation is based on accumulated earnings and profits. That means any net operating losses and capital loss carry forwards from prior years must be taken into consideration before you can establish an earnings pool for calculating equalization. 

Second, funds can use equalization both for regular subchapter M distribution purposes as well as for excise tax distribution purposes. 

Final Thoughts

There are clearly many differences in how tax equalization is calculated. When funds are using equalization, especially when they are setting it up for the first time, there are several conversations that need to happen between fund management, their tax advisers and the administrator so management can determine the appropriate methodology for the fund. Once a fund decides on a methodology, it is important to be consistent year-over-year in that approach, and to document the fund’s methodology.

There are several methodologies available and little guidance from the IRS, but it’s an incredible benefit available to funds and their shareholders. Particularly, in today’s market conditions, funds looking at very large capital gain distributions and significant redemption requests should consider tax equalization. 

Contact Jay Laurila, Ravi Singh or a member of your service team to discuss this topic further.

Cohen & Co is not rendering legal, accounting or other professional advice. Information contained in this post is considered accurate as of the date of publishing. Any action taken based on information in this blog should be taken only after a detailed review of the specific facts, circumstances and current law with your professional advisers.

About the Authors

Jay Laurila, CPA, MT

Partner, Cohen & Co Advisory, LLC
jlaurila@cohenco.com
414.203.2840

Ravi Singh, CPA, MBA

Partner, Cohen & Co Advisory, LLC
rsingh@cohenco.com
212.981.3982

Related Insights

Article

Proposed PCAOB Standards Focus on Metrics, Pose Questions for Funds and Boards

Read More
Article

Trusts & Taxes 101: Bankruptcy Protection

Read More
Sign up for Our Investment Industry Services Newsletter

Receive insights from our team of investment industry services specialists directly to your inbox as they go live in our online Knowledge Center.

Subscribe Today
Top
Subscribe to our newsletter
About Contact Submit RFP Privacy Policy

"Cohen & Co" is the brand name under which Cohen & Company, Ltd. and Cohen & Co Advisory, LLC, and its subsidiary entities, provide professional services.

Cohen & Company, Ltd. and Cohen & Co Advisory, LLC practice in an alternative practice structure in accordance with the AICPA Code of Professional Conduct and applicable law, regulations and professional standards.

Cohen & Company, Ltd. is a licensed independent CPA firm that provides attest services to its clients. Cohen & Co Advisory, LLC and its subsidiary entities provide tax, advisory and business consulting services to their clients and are not licensed CPA firms.

The entities operating under the Cohen & Co brand are independently owned and are not responsible for the services provided by any other entity operating under the Cohen & Co brand. Our use of terms such as “our firm,” “we,” “us” and other terms of similar import denote the alternative practice structure of Cohen & Company, Ltd. and Cohen & Co Advisory, LLC.

© 2025 Cohen & Co