For nonprofit finance leaders, the current environment can feel like a perfect storm: a shrinking accounting talent pool, historic funding volatility and grant requirements that grow more complex by the quarter — all while demand for your mission keeps climbing. The pressure to do more with less has never been more real.
Below offers relevant insights and an actionable playbook for controllers, CFOs, and finance directors managing tight budgets and high stakes.
Three macro trends are converging on nonprofit finance teams at the same time:
These pressures are pushing many organizations into deficit — or into program-by-program deficits masked at the consolidated level — while the old rule of thumb of holding a year of operating cash becomes harder to sustain. The good news: there are proven levers to help finance teams navigate the storm.
As funding uncertainty rises, boards and finance leaders should sharpen their focus on a few high-impact areas:
To help nonprofits build scale and flexibility, the conversation must center on the finance operating model and its three core components, underpinned by controls and governance:
A powerful early win: revisit your chart of accounts. A clean, well-structured chart of accounts, paired with documented SOPs and workflows, won't optimize everything on its own. However, it creates the foundation for efficient reporting, stronger controls and resilience through turnover.
Finance and technology are often the last areas of a nonprofit to receive funding, which is exactly why so many teams limp along on antiquated systems and manual workarounds. But budget doesn't have to be the barrier.
As a nonprofit, you should assess your finance functions along a maturity curve driven by three factors: operational efficiency, controls and governance, and finance systems and reporting. Many organizations sit on the reactive-and-manual end of the curve, and that's an expensive place to be. Heavy reliance on people leads to slow reimbursements, funding leakage, limited capacity to manage or win new grants, and few insights for decision making.
The goal isn’t to become a “world-class” finance organization. Very few organizations, even commercial ones, need that. The sweet spot is the middle: proactive, integrated and automated for the most cumbersome tasks. Getting there takes investment of time and dollars, but the ROI is strong because you’re no longer dependent on fragile, people-driven processes. A practical path forward:
Finance is too often viewed as a cost center rather than a strategic asset, which is precisely why it struggles to attract investment. The classic “four faces of the CFO” framework helps reframe the conversation. At the base, finance acts as a steward (protecting dollars, ensuring compliance, filing Form 990, producing financials). That work is essential, but it's hard to build a compelling investment case around keeping the bare necessities.
The opportunity is to move finance up the scale to strategist and innovator. This is the function that drives the insights the whole organization needs to make strategic decisions, models multiyear scenarios, anticipates headwinds and tailwinds, and sits at the heart of building the strategic plan. When finance grounds bold ideas in real financial models, pro formas and funding analysis, something shifts: leadership, the board, and program staff want to work with finance and to be part of its BI and AI pilots.
The recipe is simple yet powerful: Think big, build the roadmap but start small with a pilot.
Before replacing an enterprise resource planning (ERP) system, confirm you’ve exhausted the value of what you have. Sometimes the issue is configuration or training, not the software itself. When you’ve genuinely outgrown a platform, resist the urge to pick a tool because a new hire used it before. Instead, take a methodical approach: document your current-state complexities and future requirements, then evaluate solutions against them. A helpful frame is a “good, better, best” landscape, which evolves constantly, so treat this as a jumping off point:
| Tier | Representative Solutions | Best Fit |
|---|---|---|
| Good | QuickBooks® Online | Smaller, lower-complexity nonprofits; a natural step up from QuickBooks Desktop. |
| Better | Sylogist™ (Dynamics-based), Oracle NetSuite | Organizations needing grants management modules, AP automation, and the ability to scale and integrate bolt-on solutions. NetSuite scales easily and often discounts heavily for nonprofits. |
| Best | Sage Intacct, Blackbaud | Sage Intacct balances ease of implementation and a clean interface with robust capabilities, near the top for many nonprofits. Blackbaud offers even deeper nonprofit-specific functionality at a higher price point and complexity. |
Core ERP is the foundational building block. Organizations with many programs, locations or cost centers often add a dedicated budgeting, planning and enterprise performance management (EPM) layer to budget and forecast at the program level and consolidate upward, including cash flow forecasting:
| Tier | Representative Solutions | Best Fit |
|---|---|---|
| Good | Sage Intacct budgeting | More basic but serviceable, and integrates cleanly with Sage Intacct core finance. |
| Better | Martus, NetSuite Planning & Budgeting | Greater functionality for organizations needing richer planning and multidimensional forecasting. |
| Best | Workday® Adaptive Planning | Highly robust scenario modeling and multilevel consolidation for larger nonprofits; higher price tag, high value. |
A new system doesn’t automatically deliver ROI. Many organizations experience a “valley of despair” right after a major implementation, when performance actually dips. The usual culprits: the solution wasn’t configured optimally, teams didn't get enough training or change management, or the old process was simply carried over to a shiny new tool. If it’s business as usual, you won't reap the benefits. To protect your investment:
With talent scarce, rethink which roles must be internal and which can be flexibly resourced. A helpful way to segment the finance organization from the inside out:
Contractors and managed service providers often get an unfair reputation for being expensive. In reality, they can be a very cost-efficient way to keep the lights on. It’s important to compare both the economic and qualitative costs of each before making a decision.
As nonprofits rush toward AI, governance can’t be an afterthought. Before any substantial investment in automation, AI or a new ERP, build the strategy and roadmap and layer in governance. Establish, up front, how decisions get made and who’s involved, which decisions need board approval versus leadership signoff, and how you’ll maintain compliance, continuity and data security.
Beware of “skunkworks” AI — ad hoc tools running outside your domain that can expose the organization to real risk, especially if personally identifiable information (PII) enters an unsecured AI environment. A practical safeguard is a small, cross-functional center of excellence (or center of expertise): not a full-time team, but representatives from finance, accounting, operations, leadership, and key program stakeholders who build the roadmap and steer these decisions together.
The perfect storm of talent shortages, funding volatility and rising demand isn’t clearing anytime soon. But nonprofits that modernize their operating model — optimizing processes, integrating the right technology and resourcing strategically — can turn finance into a source of resilience and strategic advantage. Think big, build the roadmap, start small with a pilot and don't let this year's budget defer the improvements your mission needs.
Contact John Cavalier or a member of your service team to discuss this topic further.
In this blog Cohen & Co is not rendering legal, accounting, investment, tax or other professional advice. Rather, the information contained in this blog is for general informational purposes only. Any decisions or actions based on the general information contained in this blog should be made or taken only after a detailed review of the specific facts, circumstances and current law with your professional advisers.