Posted by Asha Shettigar, Dave Sobochan, Agata Orzechowska
As 2025 draws to a close, Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and real estate funds face a critical window for tax planning, compliance and strategic decision making. This article distills the latest guidance, compliance requirements and legislative changes, empowering you to optimize your year-end actions and prepare for 2026.
Even when a REIT meets all the basic requirements and deducts dividend distributions, it can still face entity-level taxes in specific situations, including:
As a practical matter, most REITs distribute 100% of their taxable income to avoid any corporate level taxes.
As mentioned, REITs must distribute at least 90% of taxable income each year to maintain their tax-advantaged status and avoid excise tax penalties. If a REIT cannot distribute 90% of its taxable income by December 31 of the tax year, it has the following options to consider:
Meeting the 90% distribution requirement doesn’t always mean distributing cash. The following options may also be available:
Review your distribution plan now to ensure compliance and minimize tax exposure.
Public REITs require specific tax planning strategies due to their unique structure. They typically announce the dividend per share for the following year at the end of the current year, helping investors plan for their tax obligations.
The primary focus for public REITs is to manage the character of dividend income as well as taxable income projections for the following year. The typical strategies around taxable income planning consider a few different alternatives, in which the following can be considered:
There are several strategies to optimize tax efficiency for REITs, including the following:
REITs must pass both asset and income tests to maintain their status as well as meet several other requirements:
January is a particularly active period for numerous REIT-related reporting and compliance deadlines. The following items need to be prepared, filed and distributed.
The OBBBA contains numerous tax law extensions as well as new provisions that may be impactful for REITs. Key areas include permanent extension of the Qualified Business Income Deduction where eligible noncorporate taxpayers can deduct up to 20% of qualified REIT dividends. This extension can simplify decision making around entity classification when planning business structures.
The legislation also permanently extends the Sec. 163(j) modified calculation of the business interest expense limitation to EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization). Previously, amortization and depreciation could not be added back when applying the limitation. Extended provision will raise adjusted taxable income (ATI) for the purpose of calculating interest expense, and, as a result, additional interest expense is expected to be deductible.
Read “One Big Beautiful Bill Up Close: Tax Impact for Real Estate”
REITs with foreign investor participation should assess the impact of this recent development on domestically controlled REIT determination rules.
As a background, domestically controlled REITs — those with less than 50% foreign ownership — are not treated as U.S. real property interests under Foreign Investment in Real Property Tax Act (FIRPTA). Consequently, foreign investors are generally not subject to U.S. tax on the sale of REIT shares. This framework has historically led foreign investors to use U.S. blocker entities when investing in U.S. real estate structures.
The 2022 proposed and 2024 final regulations introduced a look-through rule for nonpublic domestic C Corporations with more than 50% foreign ownership, including a 10-year grandfathering period.
On October 21, 2025, the Treasury and the IRS published proposed regulations that would remove the domestic C Corporation look-through rule adopted in 2024 final regulations. Under the 2025 proposed regulations, all domestic C Corporations, public or private, are treated as non-look-through entities when determining a REIT’s “domestically controlled” status. Under these rules, a domestic C Corporation may now be wholly foreign owned without jeopardizing a REIT’s domestically controlled classification. This represents a significant development for private REITs, which are frequently formed within private investment fund structures (often involving domestic blocker corporations) or joint venture arrangements.
Taxpayers may rely on the proposed regulations immediately, and, if finalized as written, they will apply retroactively to transactions on or after April 25, 2024. This would effectively override the current regulations issued on April 24, 2024, and reinstate the prior rules.
As current year’s distributions are being finalized, note that REITs are required to withhold under FIRPTA on any distribution to a foreign investor that exceeds a shareholder’s adjusted basis in accordance with Section 1445, unless an exemption applies. Accordingly, REIT return of capital (ROC) distributions are subject to FIRPTA withholding.
To mitigate or eliminate withholding on U.S. real property interests, foreign shareholders may apply for a withholding certificate using Form 8288-B. For ROC distributions, the foreign shareholder is treated as the transferor and the REIT as the transferee for purposes of this filing.
Year-end planning for real estate funds involves projecting taxable income, analyzing the characterization and timing of gains and losses, and understanding rules that convert capital gains to ordinary income, such as recapture and Sec. 1061 rules that deal with partnership interests held in connection with performance of services.
It is also important to evaluate state nexus for new investments, including any foreign investments, and to plan for withholding for foreign partners. Consider all the foreign investment related filings with respect to any new investments, which are often missed. Consider filing any U.S. tax classification elections for foreign entities (Form 8832) with respect to any new investments.
It is essential to estimate taxable income allocations to partners in advance and plan for tax distributions to ensure partners can meet their tax obligations. Equally important is maintaining clear communication with partners regarding the allocation methodology and the timing of distributions to promote transparency.
State and local tax planning should include evaluating pass-through entity tax (PTET) elections as a strategy to mitigate the SALT deduction cap. It is also important to understand the distinctions between withholding and composite filings for nonresident investors and to prepare for related state filing obligations and investor notifications. Additionally, for any new partners in the fund, confirm whether residency based state filing requirements apply in the states where those partners reside.
Sec. 1061 of the Internal Revenue Code was introduced under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) to change how certain partnership profits, commonly called carried interest, are taxed. These rules primarily affect fund managers and general partners in private equity, hedge funds, venture capital and real estate partnerships.
Historically, carried interest gains qualified for long-term capital gains treatment after one year. Sec. 1061 now requires a three-year holding period for assets linked to carried interest to receive long-term capital gains treatment.
If the holding period is less than three years, gains are recharacterized as short-term capital gains and taxed at ordinary income rates (up to 37%), rather than the lower long-term capital gains rate (typically 20%). The rules are complex, with detailed exceptions and anti-abuse provisions, and require careful tracking of holding periods, capital contributions and the character of partnership allocations.
The regulations clarify the treatment of tiered partnership structures, transfers to related persons and the application of the capital interest exception.
In summary, Sec. 1061 recharacterizes certain long-term capital gains allocated to holders of carried interests as short-term capital gains unless a three-year holding period is met, with specific exceptions and detailed regulatory guidance governing its application. Consider these rules in your year-end gain projections.
Maintain accurate partner information by confirming W-8 and W-9 forms along with investor details, including address changes, transfers or partner deaths. For foreign partners, gather necessary documentation and evaluate potential treaty benefits. Ensure W-8 forms are completed correctly and that the appropriate form is on file. Additionally, remember that updated W-8 forms must be obtained from foreign investors every three years to remain compliant.
Conduct a comprehensive review of the tax structure to ensure both efficiency and compliance with applicable regulations. This process should include evaluating entity classifications, ownership arrangements and allocation methodologies to identify opportunities for optimization. Where necessary, amend partnership agreements and related documents to align with current tax requirements and strategic management objectives, ensuring consistency between operational goals and tax planning considerations.
Evaluate whether investment-related expenses should be capitalized or deducted and consider opportunities to accelerate accruals for trade or business expenses, where permissible. Coordinate closely with your tax team to confirm eligibility for deductions and ensure compliance with applicable regulations. In addition, identify potential tax planning opportunities for your portfolio companies, such as cost segregation studies to optimize depreciation, application of Sec. 163(j) interest limitation rules and leveraging repair regulations for favorable treatment.
The OBBBA permanently reinstates the 100% bonus depreciation deduction for qualified assets placed in service after January 19, 2025, with no sunset provision — unlike the TCJA rules. Please note that assets under a written, binding contract dated before January 19, 2025, do not qualify. Portfolio companies should maintain clear documentation of bonus-eligible assets to ensure compliance.
While bonus depreciation offers immediate tax efficiency, fund managers should weigh long-term implications, including:
Establish clear timelines for preparing taxable income estimates and issuing Schedule K-1s, and schedule planning sessions with portfolio tax teams to align strategy and execution.
Year-end is a pivotal time for REITs and real estate funds to review compliance, optimize tax positions and prepare for new legislative changes. Proactive planning and attention to deadlines can make a significant difference as you head into 2026.
Contact Asha Shettigar, Dave Sobochan, Agata Orzechowska or a member of your service team to discuss this topic further.
In this blog Cohen & Co is not rendering legal, accounting, investment, tax or other professional advice. Rather, the information contained in this blog is for general informational purposes only. Any decisions or actions based on the general information contained in this blog should be made or taken only after a detailed review of the specific facts, circumstances and current law with your professional advisers.