The current demand for retail exposure to private assets is unprecedented. The investment vehicles used to deliver this democratization of private capital — primarily closed-end funds — are generally funds registered with the Investment Company Act of 1940 (1940 Act) and are taxed as RICs. With growing investor demand for private equity, private credit, direct real estate, venture capital and infrastructure, RICs present an opportunity for delivering these strategies to a broader investor base.
While the RIC tax status offers clear advantages, using it for portfolios of alternative investments introduces significant complexity. Most RICs do not invest in the private markets. Therefore, it is essential to gain a deeper understanding of the key tax rules governing tax qualification and to have actionable steps to avoid unforeseen tax liabilities.
Private asset tax challenges are primarily driven by the type of tax structure of the underlying investment and are almost identical across different funds, closed-end or not. Therefore, this discussion is relevant to most registered funds that hold alternative assets — private or not.
The following analysis will help you gain the basic tax knowledge, tools to navigate complexities and practical examples needed to align private capital strategies with RIC taxation.
Our team works with approximately one-third of the interval and tender offer fund market across diverse asset classes, including private investments, REITs, derivatives and direct real estate. What sets us apart is our ability to simplify the complex. Working with some of the most innovative investment managers, our team — 100% dedicated to the investment industry — offers in-depth insights on industry trends, direct experience and a holistic perspective.
Thank you to Brett Eichenberger, Stephen Fisher, Jay Laurila, Eric Lemmon, Erin McClafferty, Rob Meiner, Andreana Shengelya and Claire Toraason for contributing to this publication.